3's:
Clean bar. Setup well, and and the name play worked well, and executed fluidly
pavilion:
Bar had potential. Ok setup. But weak execution of a mild Wordplay
vote bet
3's:
Clean bar. Setup well, and and the name play worked well, and executed fluidly
pavilion:
Bar had potential. Ok setup. But weak execution of a mild Wordplay
vote bet
Kill a bitch and kill her kid
all depends what her nigga did
-herbo
Both bars were cool. Bets bar was clever, nice name play but wasn't that hard.the set up was nice tho, tied in with the punch nice. Pavs bar was a bit generic imo, had the aggression factor but was a miss.
V/bet
pavarotti reference was weird af, kind've falls flat for me. wp works tho
pav's punch was just lame tbh, I gtg w/ 3bet for the better attempt. subpar but not as bad as pav's
v/3bet
3bet: decent concept.. I liked pretty much everything. Actually everything.. This was a dope bar and I felt you formed it cleanly with a nice concept and wordplay.
Vs
Pavonia: the wording, set up and form of the punch was nicely set up... But the concept in my opinion was wack and the punch wasn't hard hitting
Vote: 3bet, he had a nicer concept & punch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Opera reference vs some weirdly worded bar
V 3bet
Lions don't lose sleep, over opinions of sheep
On the road to riches money stickin to my cleats
3bet yours was wack honestly. Saying someone is listening to opera isn't a diss and to set it up you used a dog correlation that doesn't even relate to anything. Pav was decent, enough to take it.
v/Pav
Not a bad little battle. Both had decent little flips... I've seen a few days/daze flips but Pavarotti was pretty dope... vote 3bet
12-4 in favor of 3bet
Add & Follow
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
·
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.