WK06: Contendership Tournament: KnoXville (2-2) vs. Smog (1-1) (Smog Wins)
https://i.ibb.co/zhwDkzm/New-1-2-Pun...gue-Design.png
Regular Battle
Punches due NO DUE DATES
Voting ends on NO DUE DATES
Rebuttal Option
both competitors must agree to it at time of check-in
format is A, B, B, A (A posts first, B drops next, B posts follow-up, A drops final bar)
You have 24hrs from when battle was set to agree on rebuttal battle
You know the rules, if not, refer to the rule thread.
@KnoXville
@Smog
Re: WK06: Contendership Tournament: KnoXville (2-2) vs. Smog (1-1)
Re: WK06: Contendership Tournament: KnoXville (2-2) vs. Smog (1-1)
You know what time it is.
Re: WK06: Contendership Tournament: KnoXville (2-2) vs. Smog (1-1)
Smog's good to go. He sent his bar in.
Re: WK06: Contendership Tournament: KnoXville (2-2) vs. Smog (1-1)
Couldn’t champ but failed twice, lacking cuz you a bitch the frail type,
Smogs used to comin out the rear, today You’re just Smudge Shooting out a Cars Tailpipe.
Re: WK06: Contendership Tournament: KnoXville (2-2) vs. Smog (1-1)
@Smog
's bar
When church folk are at my door, they leave wondering what their whole existence is
I mean, when I respond to Knox, he’ll be questioning his own faith like Jehovah’s Witnesses
Re: WK06: Contendership Tournament: KnoXville (2-2) vs. Smog (1-1) (OPEN FOR VOTES)
Smog had a quality bar. It was a great read from top to bottom. Knox started off okay but it didn't really get any better for me as the bar went on. This was a battle focused on nameflips and Smog's was more effective.
v-Smog
Re: WK06: Contendership Tournament: KnoXville (2-2) vs. Smog (1-1) (OPEN FOR VOTES)
knox my dude but he should of stayed away from any kind of smog nameflip that shits too straightforward in what to expect from it yeah smog tho his shit was comedy that first line was profound and even tho knox is a straightforward nameflip too smog was better at flippin it than knox mvgt - smog
Re: WK06: Contendership Tournament: KnoXville (2-2) vs. Smog (1-1) (OPEN FOR VOTES)
I would have liked for Knox to provide some links for "Couldn't champ but failed twice" so I could get a clearer understanding of where he was taking the bar. Everything was based on that opening statement and it need supporting evidence to make it connect with me. Smog was real funny with his setup, it had me looking forward to the punchline itself, and he didn't disappoint me. Dope bar. I'm going with Smog.
Re: WK06: Contendership Tournament: KnoXville (2-2) vs. Smog (1-1) (OPEN FOR VOTES)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Preston and Ivy
I would have liked for Knox to provide some links for "Couldn't champ but failed twice" so I could get a clearer understanding of where he was taking the bar. Everything was based on that opening statement and it need supporting evidence to make it connect with me. Smog was real funny with his setup, it had me looking forward to the punchline itself, and he didn't disappoint me. Dope bar. I'm going with Smog.
I didn't like Knox bar at all. Smog is smog and smudge is smog too. I don't really see much a difference. I can relate to Smog's punchline because that kind of thing happens around here all the time and it's so frustrating to me. Lol. I have Smog winning.
Re: WK06: Contendership Tournament: KnoXville (2-2) vs. Smog (1-1) (OPEN FOR VOTES)
Knox getting better, needs to try thinking outside the box though. That bar from Smog was dope put together really well, the setup complemented the punch and wording was tight. V-Smog
Re: WK06: Contendership Tournament: KnoXville (2-2) vs. Smog (1-1) (OPEN FOR VOTES)
knox you could have done more with coming out the rear.. something about him getting blasted maybe
smog i have 0 complaints, this is dope.
v/ smog the goat
Re: WK06: Contendership Tournament: KnoXville (2-2) vs. Smog (1-1) (OPEN FOR VOTES)